Ivan Panin Bible Numerics11/3/2022 ![]() ![]() Is not the numerical-value of the name James, as that name is spelled Numericist may be prepared to go in his quest of numeric factors. Shows with the utmost clearness the extremes to which a convinced ![]() The answer to this question is to be carefully considered because it Then is this ending omitted in the case of the name James? The 26 biblical writers to one which would not be divisible by 7. If used, it would change the total for the 5 NT writers and for With the ending, the name James would have the value 1103 Peter (755) and Paul (781), this ending is included in the total. We observe with no little surprise that in the case of the names In the Greek allįive end in "s" and James, Peter, and Paul all have the ending "os" of We are entitled toĮxpect them to be used as they are spelled in the NT. Their names are either Greek or have a Greek form. Since these are NT writers and their names all appear in the NT, These writers are James, Peter, Jude, Paul, Turning our attention to the five NT "writers," we notice something It is remarkable that both Panin and Sabiers should have made This invalidates three of the ten "features" stressed by Included in the list of 21 writers and they are certainly "named" in This ignores Solomon and Jonah, both of whom are "writers," 7 only are "named" in the NT (Moses, David, Isaiah, Jeemiah,ĭaniel, Hosea, Joel). According to "Feature Six" (Sabiers), of the 21 names of Panin then published a translation of his rigged hybrid Greek text, which he called the Numeric English New Testament.Many other features found in the OT group of 21 "writers" might well beĬonsidered. Moreover, Panin warns the reader that there are many pitfalls into which the inexperienced handler of Bible numerics is likely to fall in particular, to verify any but the simplest of features requires the authentic Greek text that Panin himself published in 1934 and titled The Numeric Greek New Testament. Thus the ordinary reader cannot verify any but the simplest feature of the reported pattern of sevens. The number of words refers to the Greek words classification into vocabulary, forms and figures requires a knowledge of Greek and compilations of these data are subject to the investigator's discretion. Most of these features are difficult to check. #Ivan Panin Bible Numerics codeJack Robinson - The Testimony - March, 2000īible Code II (Ivan Panin and Biblical Numerics) (The Readings - March 1999) Here is the simplest quote that shows how Ivan Panin's (1880-1942) system was designed to work with his own text, that was made to support his system. Ivan Panin, Made-to-Order Versions, and the Numeric Deception I wrote on this a KJBD defense forum post in 2004 with the title: Chuck Missler seems to be the only popular person who is a mess on this today. The fact that Panin designs his own text to fit the theory should tell you enough. A lot depends on how savvy you are on math and statistical manipulations. Since we have gone over this numerous times, and it is a minor issue, I have not written a paper on it. Even in the section above, there were vague references to a Greek text, yet Missler did not even tell you which one, which would be absolutely necessary, since every text has variants. There was rigging everywhere, nothing was rigorous, his work is worse than worthless. At other times he made up his own text so that the numbers would work. At times he actually used the Westcott-Hort text in his calculations. Why don't you do a bit of web research? I'll give you a couple of points. There is so much stuff on Panin's methodology. The couple of minutes on Westcott and Hort were very lean, and not as bad. To make it worse, Missler is relying on totally bogus arguments from Ivan Panin. Shoddy scholarship is a discredit to our defense of God's pure word. #Ivan Panin Bible Numerics plusPlus he is quite inaccurate factually, like when he says near the beginning that 5,556 mss were available to the learned men oh the AV. Missler has a very inconsistent Bible position, so anybody wading through his body of work will end up confused. (no longer available, it was from named "Westcott & Hort versions VS King James Version - Dr. Please watch entirety before giving your thoughts on this video. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |